[repost] 10 Gay Lessons from The Golden Girls

Leave a comment

This came through the Huffington Post yesterday and given the central role The Golden Girls have played in my life … it is just brilliant. Here is the full text of the article but I’ve included just the first bits below:

Here are 10 gay lessons from The Golden Girls:

10. Have integrity.
9. Tell the truth.
8. Never be ashamed.
7. Don’t let anyone bully you.
6. There is nothing wrong with being different.
5. Don’t let anything hold you back.
4. Always be yourself.
3. Don’t be a bitch.
2. Share your stories.
1. Make your own family.

Made it to the Grad Studies website: I’m famous

Leave a comment

Shared a few thoughts and my contact information with the Faculty of Education Grad Studies office – and bam! – I’m on the website.

Happy to share with folks re: grad school and SFU’s Faculty of Education in general: mkrugerr (at) sfu (dot) ca.

Summer ’13: All about the body

1 Comment

Without much conscious reflection, this term has turned into a full-blown embrace of the body via phenomenology.

I’m doing a Directed Readings with Stephen Smith on phenomenology and phenomenological research methods. My reading list includes all the biggies (Husserl, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty).

I’m also taking “Embodiment and Curriculum Inquiry” with Celeste Snowber. See the course outline.

In short, it’s all about the body!

Roundtable at UBC’s IOP Conference this Saturday (May 11)

Leave a comment

Investigating Our Practices 2013
IOP’s 16th Annual Conference
Saturday, May 11, 2013 — 8:30am – 1:30pm
Neville Scarfe Building, UBC
pdce.educ.ubc.ca/iop2013

Program Summary [ PDF ]

List of Sessions [ PDF ]

Presentations [ PDF ]

Mine (Speaking the Being of Teaching) is during Session A, 9:00 – 9:40, in Room 203.

Here’s the blurb: In this roundtable, we will explore the spaces where who we are as teachers and learners occurs. Teaching is dominated by knowing; we speak of knowing things, dates, names, and facts. As teachers we deal in knowledge: knowing is a criteria for advancement, a critical factor in deciding who is smart, who is right, who has power. Surely knowing is helpful. But to move forward, to truly think differently, we need to consider questions regarding the being of teaching. We have become addicted to knowing. We are complacent in our knowing; once we know something — we are content. “I already know that.”

This roundtable is about being, not knowing. What might be possible in educating were being brought into the
conversation? Not to supplant knowing, but to complement. For example: Who am I being such that teaching and
learning is possible? Who am I being such that this lesson flopped? Questions of being change the game of teaching. They rewrite the rules, invent new rules. In our brief discussion we will speak the being of teaching to remind us of just how much of a say we have in teaching, learning, our relationships, and our lives.

A Plea for Pedagogy

Leave a comment

I sent off this piece of writing (and have yet to hear back with feedback/reviewer comments!) but figured I’d go ahead and share out the first section.

A Plea for Pedagogy
Matthew J. Kruger-Ross
matthewkrugerross@gmail.com

It goes without saying that technology is changing education. Children’s brains are being rewired, universities are being threatened with extinction, and we will be in serious trouble if we ignore the transformative power of new technologies. We live in an information/knowledge economy where we are constantly connected to networks of information, our experiences become more and more mediated. While I can meet virtually face-to-face with colleagues on the east coast, children’s attention spans decrease and their ability to think beyond the first few entries of a Google search are beyond alarming. I can access the work of any scholarly journal imaginable, but university and public libraries come closer and closer to financial ruin from the same journals’ subscription fees and access rights. It seems that technology changes everything in life, including educating.

Or does it? Over the past few years I have read extensively in the field of educational technology as well as taught and led training/professional development sessions for K-16 teachers interested in integrating technologies into their classrooms (face-to-face or otherwise). I have, unfortunately, been one to raise the banner of new technologies and their ability to transform teaching and learning. However, it occurred to me recently that much of the hype surrounding the influence of technology on educating were due more to pedagogical principles rather than some inherent feature of the technology in question. In this essay I select and discuss a four approaches* to educating that focus on the use of technology. In these approaches, it is assumed that technology provides some sort of innovation, a way of doing and thinking about teaching and learning that did not exist before the entrance of the technology. Therefore, it is the technology that has transformed the teaching and learning.

Or is it?** In the same way that Egan (1997; 2005) sketches out the three irreducible aims of education, it seems to me that so-called innovations attributed to technology are mostly pedagogical strategies cloaked in digital media. This may be a growing realization in the field of educational technology***, but this is yet to be fully realized. The question at the heart of this analysis is Are approaches to educational technology truly innovational or transformational? And, if they are not, as I suppose, what is the foundation of the approaches? These questions do not rule out the possibility of the ability of technology to transform human experience, understanding, and so on. However, they do attempt to reverse much of the rhetoric surrounding the influences of technology as they are currently understood and experienced while leaving space for the potential of truly interesting and innovative pedagogical strategies that might be enhanced via communication technologies. To begin, a quick overview of the field is helpful.


* The term “approaches” I am using liberally; some practitioners would prefer their perspective of choice to be labeled a program, theory, or framework. This in itself is interesting, but must be saved for a later date.

** This is difficult to describe, but I am officially rejecting much of the field of educational technology. Other than my own ineptitude, the difficulty you may encounter in reading may be due to my attempts to work within a language I learned in my instructional technology Masters program, while still trying to connect these ideas and concepts so that they might be understandable by educators outside of the field. So while to someone unfamiliar with the ongoing work in the field of educational technology my argument may not be fully effective, I think it important to note that most of my peers would consider these ideas to be heresy.

*** I say a “growing trend” with a great deal of wishful thinking. While attending a forum on MOOCs a few weeks ago, Alyssa Wise (SFU Faculty of Education) reflected that scholars of educational technology are finally beginning to realize that, for the most part, new and innovative technologies – regardless of their inherent and apparent innovativeness – recapitulate teaching and learning approaches that human beings have been aware of for quite a long time.

Upcoming symposium: Embodiment, Mindfulness: Contemplative Perspectives and Approaches to Education

Leave a comment

May 2013 Flyer

Open the PDF

Upcoming symposium: Embodiment, Mindfulness: Contemplative Perspectives and Approaches to Education (see flyer above).

DATE: MAY 16TH, 2013
TIME: 3 PM TO 6:30 PM
LOCATION: SFU DOWNTOWM CAMPUS, ROOM 2945

The keynote by Professor Deborah Orr (York University) is sponsored by our Faculty Lecture Series. Please see the program linked above for the details. Also attached is the ABSTRACT for Professor Orr’s talk.

Space is limited. If you are interested in attending, register right away. The registration ends on April 26.

There are two kinds of registration available to you:

REGISTRATION ONE: the WHOLE SYMPOSIUM, from 3 pm to 6:30 pm.

REGISTRATION TWO: just the FACULTY LECTURE (Prof. Orr’s Keynote), from 5 pm to 6:30 pm.

When you register, please specify which one you are choosing.

To register, please visit

http://www.doodle.com/gq3ywqdqr392vqhm

We look forward to seeing you at the May Symposium!

Next round of books I’ve had to let go

Leave a comment

I am obsessed with books, and they’ve yet to turn me away when I go to get more. But, every once in awhile I have to let some go… they’re just not in the cards for right now. Here’s the latest batch:

Anatomy of Revolution by Crane Brinton

Embodied Prayer by Celeste Snowber

The Alluring Problem by D. J. Enright

The Sociology of Education in Canada by Terry Wotherspoon

Truth & Truthfulness by Bernard Williams

Older Entries

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 600 other followers

%d bloggers like this: